Good refutes to another scientific explaination as to how the world began

Some scientists don't believe that the planets were created by a big bang, but they do believe that gravity pulled some dust particles together, and more dust started to come together, and, over a long period of time, just like snow packs together, this dust started to get more compact and started drawing more dust.
1. If that's true, then maybe that's why Columbus thought that the world was smaller than it actually was; the previous calculation of the world's size was actually true, it was just that America and the Indians had just formed out of some new dust.
2. I don't think water came from dust.
3. If living things could form out of dust particles, then the top of my dresser would be flowing with new living creatures and plants that aren't anywhere else in the universe. If you say, "Well the dust takes a long time to draw together and form something living"... O, it's been there for a long time!