Good refutes to another scientific explaination as to how the world began

Some scientists don't believe that the planets were created by a big bang, but they do believe that gravity pulled some dust particles together, and more dust started to come together, and, over a long period of time, just like snow packs together, this dust started to get more compact and started drawing more dust.
1. If that's true, then maybe that's why Columbus thought that the world was smaller than it actually was; the previous calculation of the world's size was actually true, it was just that America and the Indians had just formed out of some new dust.
2. I don't think water came from dust.
3. If living things could form out of dust particles, then the top of my dresser would be flowing with new living creatures and plants that aren't anywhere else in the universe. If you say, "Well the dust takes a long time to draw together and form something living"... O, it's been there for a long time!

Another look at the sowing-reaping lesson

Micah 7:13: Notwithstanding the land shall be desolate because of them that dwell therein, for the fruit of their doings.
We read this verse in family devotions today, and that last part of the verse struck me hard; it was "for the fruit of their doings." The land was desolate, with nothing good or healthy in it, because, as the verse says, the fruit of their doings wasn't very good either. You know, you do reap what you sow, but you also eat what you reap, and if you're not sowing anything good, then you're not reaping anything good, and if you're not reaping anything good, then you're not eating anything good, and if you're not eating anything good, you're going to die.

#1 Refute to the Big Bang Theory

Bangs have never created life; only destroyed it.

It is Now the Last Week of School for Me! Yay!

Keep praying...